Property Institute of New Zealand

1. Official Name: Property Institute of New Zealand (PINZ)

2. Established: 2000 – Formed as a merger of three predecessor bodies. It was created “to act as the voice of property professionals” in the new millennium.

3. Predecessor Organisations: New Zealand Institute of Valuers (NZIV), Institute of Plant & Machinery Valuers (IPMV), and Property & Land Economy Institute of New Zealand (PLEINZ). These memberships were incorporated into PINZ upon its founding.

4. Legal Status: Incorporated Society (Registration No. 1001330). NZIV remains a statutory body under the Valuers Act 1948, with all registered valuers automatically members of NZIV. PINZ provides the membership and administrative structure for NZIV under this legal framework.

5. Headquarters: Wellington, New Zealand – Office at Level 2, 76 Willis Street, Wellington 6011

6. Regional Branches: 17 regional branches across New Zealand, enabling local member engagement and events.

7. Membership: Approximately 2,000–2,600 members (estimates vary). PINZ reported “nearly 2000” members in 2021, while earlier sources note over 2,500 members including overseas members and ~2,600 as of 2009. Membership spans professional valuers, property managers, property advisors/consultants, and plant/machinery valuers. All registered valuers are by law members of NZIV (which is aligned with PINZ).

8. Mission & Objectives: PINZ’s mission is to “be the voice of property professionals” and uphold professional standards in the property industry. Stated core principles include promoting exemplary ethical practice, integrity and transparency, fostering professional development, pursuing excellence in property services, and acting in a socially responsible manner. PINZ positions itself as the leading professional body setting standards, qualifications, and ethics across property disciplines.

9. Services & Activities: Provides member services such as industry research, publications, networking events, online resources, and continuing professional development (CPD) programs. Publishes Property Professional magazine and hosts webinars for knowledge-sharing. Organises an annual conference and the Property Professional Awards to recognize industry excellence. PINZ also runs initiatives like the “Women in Property” award (launched 2019) to promote diversity.

10. Leadership Structure (Governance): Governed by a National Board. The PINZ President (Board Chair) is an elected senior member who serves a fixed term (often two years). As of 2022–2023, the President and Board Chair is Benjamin Gill, who took over from Luke van den Broek. Gill is concurrently a public-sector property director (DIA) – see Government Connections. Prior Presidents include Patrick O’Reilly (2017–2019), Luke van den Broek (2019–2021), and Ben Gill (2021/22–present). The President leads an elected Board of property professionals from various sectors. The Board includes representatives of major membership groups – e.g., the President of NZIV sits on the PINZ Board ex officio.

11. Executive Management: Day-to-day operations are run by a management team. Chief Executive Officer: Vivienne (Viv) Gurrey (appointed 2019). Gurrey has a corporate background (former Managing Director of SAP NZ and IBM roles) and governance experience (ex-Deputy Chair, Pharmacy Council NZ). Chief Operating Officer: Scott McLew. Chief of Communications & Strategy: Jason Ede. Chief of Staff: Rebecca van Etten. Group Financial Controller: Carlos Castro. Marketing & Brand Manager: Bronwyn Starke. Governance Secretariat: Robyn Matthews. Membership Secretariat: Rochelle Misseldine. This management team supports the Board and handles member services.

12. Subsidiary Entities / Divisions: PINZ encompasses semi-autonomous councils for specialized member groups:

    • New Zealand Institute of Valuers (NZIV): The statutory professional body for registered valuers (est. 1938). NZIV retains its own President and Council to address valuation-specific matters. PINZ and NZIV work in tandem; NZIV’s President (e.g., Jeff Alexander 2019–21, Adam Binns 2021–23) sits on the PINZ board. NZIV is constituted by the Valuers Act, which mandates all registered valuers be NZIV members. PINZ provides administrative support to NZIV and often the same individuals are involved in both.

    • Property Managers Institute of New Zealand (PROMINZ): Formed when the Independent Property Managers Association joined PINZ in 2019. Represents residential property managers. This merger brought independent property managers under the PINZ umbrella, rebranding them as PROMINZ with PINZ providing oversight on standards and training.

    • Plant & Machinery Valuers Institute (PMVI): Now a PINZ section for plant/machinery valuers, originally one of the merger bodies in 2000.

    • Property & Land Economy Institute of NZ (PLEINZ): Another legacy body merged into PINZ in 2000, representing property economists/land consultants (now integrated into PINZ’s broader membership).

13. Related Commercial Entities: PINZ has created or partnered with separate entities for member services:

    • Property Education & Training Limited: A wholly-owned company of PINZ (100% shareholding) used for professional training programs. (Company now removed from register as its functions were likely absorbed internally; it was fully owned by “The Property Institute of New Zealand Incorporated” during its operation.)

    • Land Professionals NZ Limited: A joint venture company (est. 2014) in which PINZ held a one-third stake. This entity’s shareholding included PINZ (33.3%) and possibly other land-related professional bodies. It was intended to collaborate across land professions (e.g., surveyors, valuers) – e.g., its directors included PINZ’s CEO. (Status: company was registered in 2014 and later marked “removed” by 2021.)

    • Land Professionals Mutual Society (LPMS): While not owned by PINZ, LPMS is an affiliated mutual insurance scheme providing professional indemnity coverage to valuers and others. PINZ often directs members to such services.

14. Strategic Industry Partnerships: PINZ engages in partnerships to benefit members and extend influence: Notably, in 2021 PINZ entered a Strategic Partnership with Valocity – a leading NZ-founded property valuation technology platform. This partnership aims to “support the ongoing learning, development and connection of the property ecosystem” by leveraging Valocity’s data and tech for PINZ members. Valocity (founded by Carmen Vicelich in 2014) provides digital tools for lenders and valuers, and the tie-up indicates PINZ’s endorsement of innovation in valuations. PINZ’s CEO highlighted that such relationships put the profession “at the forefront” of economic recovery and growth. (Valocity is an independent company, not owned by PINZ, but this partnership underscores PINZ’s industry influence.) PINZ also maintains close links with the Australian Property Institute (API) (collaborating on standards and technology) and with global valuation standard-setters.

15. Affiliations & International Links: PINZ (through the NZIV) is a member of the International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC), as the recognized valuation professional organisation (VPO) for New Zealand. It has adopted IVSC’s global valuation standards in its guidance. PINZ maintains relationships with sister bodies like the Australian Property Institute (API) – jointly developing valuation standards and sharing best practices. PINZ is also connected to the Asia-Pacific valuation and property professional community through conferences and bilateral agreements. These affiliations enhance PINZ’s authority in setting professional benchmarks and give it a voice in international valuation policy.

16. Government Connections (Revolving Door): PINZ has notable links to government and politics via its personnel: Jason Ede, PINZ’s Communications & Strategy Chief, is a former senior adviser to Prime Minister John Key’s National Government. Ede was a central figure in the 2014 “Dirty Politics” scandal (alleged involvement in political dirty tricks) and resigned from the National Party in the fallout. His move into PINZ (in 2016) placed a seasoned political operator at the helm of PINZ’s public relations. Benjamin Gill, current PINZ President, simultaneously serves as Director of Property at the Department of Internal Affairs (NZ Government). This means the head of PINZ is a senior public servant managing government property assets, a dual role that exemplifies the close interweaving of industry and government. Past CEO Ashley Church had deep political ties in the advocacy sphere: after leading PINZ, he became a prominent right-wing lobbyist (e.g. Board member and briefly Chair of the Taxpayers’ Union in 2021). Several PINZ board members and advisors have held government-appointed roles – e.g. Viv Gurrey was Deputy Chair of the Pharmacy Council (a Crown regulatory entity) before joining PINZ. Moreover, NZIV (the valuers’ council under PINZ) nominates members to the government’s Valuers Registration Board, meaning PINZ insiders sit on the statutory regulator for valuers. (For instance, NZIV-nominated members like Evan Gamby and Tim Crighton have been appointed to the Board by the government.) This nomination power effectively embeds the Institute’s influence in the regulatory regime.

17. Policy Advocacy & Lobbying Activities: PINZ engages actively in policy advocacy on behalf of property professionals, though not formally registered as a lobby (NZ has no mandatory lobbyist register). It regularly makes submissions to Parliament and government consultations on legislation affecting property, often advocating industry-friendly positions. For example, PINZ (and NZIV) submitted on the Overseas Investment Amendment Bill 2018 (foreign buyer ban), warning that a strict ban could “lead to a contraction in housing availability” and exacerbate rental shortages – effectively opposing the government’s ban on foreign home buyers. PINZ has been “a strong vocal opponent” of certain Reserve Bank housing finance restrictions, such as Debt-to-Income (DTI) limits. PINZ often aligns with positions favorable to property investors and economic liberalization, while framing them as protecting home buyers or the property market’s health. The Institute also lobbies for industry self-regulation and professional standards in lieu of government control – for instance, pushing for an updated but balanced Valuers Act (via its “Valuers Act Review Group” and input to LINZ) to modernize the 1948 regime without overly burdensome new rules. PINZ leaders frequently meet officials (informally) and use their government contacts to influence policy behind closed doors (these interactions are typically undisclosed publicly).

18. Public Relations & Media Influence: As a key industry voice, PINZ maintains an active media presence to shape public and political opinion. The Institute issues press releases and commentary on housing market trends, often quoted in news outlets as an expert authority. Under former CEO Ashley Church (a polished media commentator), PINZ aggressively courted media: e.g., PINZ slammed the Reserve Bank’s credit restrictions in press statements picked up by news sites, accusing the Bank of “politically motivated” moves and even calling for curbing RBNZ’s powers. These strong public statements were a form of lobbying via media, applying pressure on policymakers. PINZ’s communications strategy – now led by Jason Ede – is notably sophisticated: Ede’s background in political comms suggests PINZ leverages insider messaging tactics. For instance, PINZ applauded the National Party’s 2017 policy to block DTI mortgage caps, immediately issuing statements praising the “common sense” of then-PM Bill English’s decision. This close echoing of political announcements indicates coordination and influence. PINZ also positions itself as a “key media contributor and commentator on property industry issues”, providing expert quotes that can subtly steer the policy narrative (e.g. emphasizing supply over demand-side interventions in housing debates). Additionally, PINZ engages membership in letter-writing or feedback campaigns on regulations and hosts events where politicians are invited (e.g. Parliamentary breakfasts, though specific instances are not publicly disclosed).

19. Notable Advocacy Stances: PINZ’s track record shows a consistent bent towards pro-market, anti-regulatory stances in political issues: It opposed Capital Gains Tax proposals, opposed banning foreign buyers as noted above, opposed stricter mortgage lending rules (LVRs/DTIs), and supported self-regulation of property managers. On that last issue, when the government moved to license residential property managers (to protect landlords/tenants from bad operators), PINZ – having absorbed the property managers’ association – signaled support for raising standards but likely lobbied to shape the regulatory scheme in the industry’s interest (e.g. advocating a role for PINZ in accreditation). Specific details of PINZ’s stance on property manager regulation are not publicly documented – Data Not Found. Conversely, PINZ has supported policies that benefit the property sector: e.g., it “applauds” political pledges to ease mortgage credit or remove obstacles to development. The Institute often couches its positions in public interest terms (housing affordability, economic growth) while advancing the professional and commercial interests of its members.

20. Political Donations: Data Not Found. There is no record of the Property Institute (or NZIV/PINZ) making donations to political parties or candidates. As a non-profit professional body, PINZ is not known to directly finance politics. Likewise, no public disclosures indicate that PINZ’s related entities donated to campaigns. (Any political spending is more likely in the form of issue advocacy and PR, rather than donations.)

21. Government Funding or Contracts: Data Not Found. PINZ does not appear to receive direct government funding. It is funded by member dues and its commercial activities. There are no known government contracts awarded to PINZ. (However, PINZ’s members and leaders at times secure government advisory roles – see Government Connections – which is a form of indirect support/recognition.)

22. Controversies: The Institute itself has largely avoided public scandal, but questions of integrity and transparency have arisen regarding its methods and personnel. A notable point is PINZ’s hiring of Jason Ede, who was implicated in a major political scandal (Dirty Politics, 2014) involving unethical tactics. Bringing Ede on as Chief of Strategy (2016) was done without fanfare; while no scandal was reported at PINZ, the move drew quiet concern in political circles given Ede’s reputation. Another controversy is perceived “integrity-washing” – PINZ proclaims high ethical standards, yet employs behind-the-scenes lobby techniques common in industry advocacy. Some critics note the lack of transparency in PINZ’s lobbying (e.g., undisclosed meetings with officials, private influence via ex-government insiders). There have also been murmurs about conflicts of interest: for instance, having the PINZ President simultaneously working as a high-level government property manager could pose conflict between public duty and industry advocacy (no formal allegation, but observers have flagged it as unusual). No formal complaints or legal disputes involving PINZ have surfaced publicly – its controversies center on transparency and potential conflicts rather than overt misconduct.

23. Integrity & Ethics Oversight: PINZ publishes a Code of Ethics for its members (requiring members to act with integrity, impartiality, and professionalism – exact text Data Not Found as it’s available to members). It has disciplinary processes for professional misconduct by members (often handled via NZIV for valuers). However, there is no independent oversight of PINZ’s lobbying activities. New Zealand’s absence of a lobbying register means PINZ’s interactions with policymakers are not publicly logged. The Integrity Institute (a transparency watchdog) has identified PINZ as part of the “ecosystem of influence that operates largely unseen” in NZ politics. PINZ leadership touts their commitment to integrity and transparency in principle, but the organisation does not proactively disclose meetings with ministers or submissions unless required. This gap between stated values and practice has been noted by observers as an area of concern (though not yet addressed through any reform).

24. Financial Profile: PINZ’s finances are not published in detail. Revenue is derived principally from membership fees (annual dues from ~2000+ members), educational course fees, events (conferences, sponsorships), and publications. It also likely earns income from its certification programs and any services like valuation standards or insurance referrals. No public financial statements are readily available – as an incorporated society that is not a charity, it has limited public reporting obligations (basic annual returns filed with the Companies Office – specific figures Data Not Found). Expenditures focus on member services, staff salaries, and advocacy activities. There is no evidence of large outside funding. The budget is modest relative to corporate lobbies; for instance, PINZ does not have a PAC or large political expenditure line.

25. Membership Structure & Dues: PINZ membership is composed of individual professionals. Categories include Fellows, Members, Graduates, Students, etc., across its divisions (valuers, property managers, etc.). All registered valuers must pay NZIV/PINZ fees as part of maintaining their practicing certificate (statutory requirement). Membership dues (exact amounts tiered by category – Data Not Found) are the primary funding source. The Institute also offers corporate partnerships and sponsorship opportunities, but corporate members do not vote (voting rights lie with individual professionals). PINZ has over 20 Life Members honored for service (e.g., distinguished valuers like Gwendoline Callaghan, life member since 2014).

26. Alliances & Industry Coalitions: PINZ often works in concert with other property-sector groups on common interests. It has informal alliances with landlord associations, property investor federations, and real estate bodies when lobbying on housing policy (e.g., during debates on Capital Gains Tax or tenancy law, PINZ’s views aligned with the Property Investors Federation – though no formal coalition announced). It also coordinates with business lobby groups on broader economic issues – for example, PINZ’s former CEO Ashley Church concurrently led the Auckland Property Investors’ Association and sat on a fiscally conservative think tank, indicating shared platforms. Internationally, PINZ’s alignment with the Australian Property Institute yields a trans-Tasman front on valuation standards and professional recognition. PINZ is not affiliated with any political party, but its leadership has clear links to right-of-center networks.

27. Transparency Initiatives: None – PINZ does not publish transparency reports about its lobbying. There is no public register of meetings with ministers or submissions (beyond what Parliament’s process publishes). The Integrity Institute’s new “NZ Lobbying & Influence Register” project has flagged PINZ for inclusion as an entity warranting public scrutiny. Internally, PINZ shares an annual report with members (financial summary and strategic plan – Data Not Found publicly). It has a member login portal for governance documents (the Strategy Outline and budget are accessible to logged-in members). To the public, however, PINZ operates opaquely regarding its political interactions, typical of NZ’s lobbying environment.

28. Regulatory Capture Concerns: As the regulator and the regulated are intertwined, there are observations of potential regulatory capture. NZIV (run by valuers via PINZ) both represents valuers and has statutory roles in their discipline, and it nominates members to the Valuers Registration Board (which adjudicates valuer conduct). This means PINZ/NZIV effectively help choose their regulators – a structure that could favour industry leniency. Indeed, the government’s current Valuers Act reform aims to update the 1948 framework, potentially addressing these governance issues. PINZ has been closely involved in that reform dialogue, and critics will watch whether the new regime reduces the Institute’s self-regulatory dominance or largely enshrines its role (early indications are the Bill continues to rely on the profession’s input heavily – analysis pending). Outside valuations, similar capture questions arise: PINZ absorbing the property managers group just as regulation was looming could be seen as an attempt to steer the rules (integrating the once-independent property managers into an Institute that can influence rule-making). PINZ publicly insists it works in the public interest to raise standards, but the dual role of industry advocate and standard-setter is inherently conflicted.

29. Official Representation & Influence: PINZ is routinely consulted by government ministries and parliamentary committees as the representative body for property professionals. It has provided expert witnesses to Select Committees (e.g., on land valuation, housing supply, leasehold land issues – specific hearings Data Not Found). The Institute is often invited to stakeholder workshops by MBIE (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) and LINZ (Land Information NZ) on property market regulations. For instance, LINZ involved NZIV/PINZ in the Valuers Act review process (one of PINZ’s trustees chaired the Valuers Act Review Group contributing to reform proposals). PINZ’s influence can be seen in policy outcomes: the delay and moderation of DTI mortgage restrictions in NZ were arguably influenced by sustained industry lobbying from groups like PINZ, which loudly opposed such tools. In 2023, when a new government vowed to overturn certain housing regulations (e.g., removing rent controls or re-opening foreign buyer channels), PINZ’s prior advocacy positions aligned closely. This alignment suggests that PINZ’s lobbying (often done quietly via its well-connected operatives) has had tangible impact on New Zealand’s political decisions related to property.

---

Sources

1. Property Institute of New Zealand, NZ Adviser (Key Media) – Company profile with history, membership and key people details (Year established 2000; ~2,000 members; Viv Gurrey CEO; Jason Ede head of comms) – https://www.mpamag.com/nz/companies/property-institute-of-new-zealand/307839

2. Property Institute – Formation and Merger of Organisations, National Library of New Zealand – Archives noting PINZ was formed in 2000 by incorporating NZIV, IPMV, and PLEINZ memberships, to act as “the voice of property professionals” – https://natlib.govt.nz/records/38386742

3. Changing of the guard at PINZ & NZIV, Scoop News (21 June 2019) – PINZ press release announcing new Presidents (Luke van den Broek for PINZ, Jeff Alexander for NZIV) and noting integration of Independent Property Managers Association as PROMINZ – http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU201906/S00536.htm

4. Valocity and PINZ announce new Strategic Partnership, Valocity Global (Press release) (1 Feb 2021) – Details on partnership between PINZ and Valocity; quotes CEO Viv Gurrey on delivering innovation; notes PINZ membership “nearly 2000” – https://www.valocityglobal.com/tr-tr/2021/02/valocity-pinz-announce-new-strategic-partnership/

5. International Valuation Standards Council – Member Organisations, Wikipedia – Lists the Property Institute of New Zealand (PINZ) as the recognized valuation professional organisation (VPO) for NZ within IVSC – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Valuation_Standards_Council

6. Jason Ede resigns from National Party after Dirty Politics, NZ Herald (APNZ report, 21 Sep 2014) – Reports Jason Ede’s resignation amid Dirty Politics scandal; details allegations: as John Key’s adviser he accessed Labour’s database and passed info to blogger Cameron Slater – https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/jason-ede-resigns-from-the-national-party-after-dirty-politics-scandal/2AF45CDYIMQLK23OJSZNAMNAAQ/

7. Property Institute slams RBNZ ‘u-turn’, Landlords.co.nz (19 July 2016) – Article featuring Ashley Church (PINZ CEO) condemning the Reserve Bank’s sudden tightening of LVR rules; quotes Church accusing RBNZ of political expediency and suggesting Government remove RBNZ powers if it’s influenced by politics – https://www.landlords.co.nz/article/976512925/property-institute-slams-rbnz-u-turn

8. Property Institute applauds scrapping of DTI plans, NZ Adviser/MPA (Krizzel Canlas, 16 Aug 2017) – News piece on PINZ’s response to PM Bill English ruling out DTI mortgage caps; quotes Ashley Church calling it “fantastic news” and noting PINZ had strongly opposed DTIs, preparing a submission to RBNZ – https://www.mpamag.com/nz/news/general/property-institute-applauds-scrapping-of-dti-plans/304340

9. Overseas Investment Amendment Bill – Update, Pitt & Moore Lawyers (June 2018) – Law firm summary of foreign buyer ban bill status; notes PINZ’s submission argued the bill could lead investors to shy away, worsening rental shortages; directly quotes PINZ’s warning about contraction in housing availability – https://www.pittandmoore.co.nz/publications/update-on-overseas-investment-amendment-bill/

10. New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union – Leadership section, Wikipedia – Mentions Ashley Church, “former CEO of the Property Institute of NZ,” invited onto the Taxpayers’ Union Board in 2020 and briefly becoming chair in 2021 – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Taxpayers%27_Union

11. Benjamin Gill – LinkedIn Post (President announcement), LinkedIn (circa early 2023) – Ben Gill announces he’s become PINZ President, taking over from Luke van den Broek, and will work closely with CEO Viv Gurrey; profile shows his day job as Director of Property at Dept of Internal Affairs – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benjamin-gill-0b820788_delighted-to-announce-my-appointment-as-president-activity-6940863248736866304-bOSq

12. Appointed as NZIV Council president, Otago Daily Times (Sally Rae, 2 Mar 2021) – Profile of Adam Binns, incoming NZIV President; notes he takes over from Jeff Alexander, and that Binns will also sit on the PINZ board as NZIV representative; describes NZIV as governing body of valuers nationwide (founded 1938) – https://www.odt.co.nz/business/appointed-nziv-council-president

13. Valuers Act 1948 – Incorporation of NZ Institute of Valuers, NZ Legal Information Institute – States that the Act establishes NZIV as a body corporate and that every registered valuer is automatically a member of NZIV (compulsory membership) – http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/va19481948n63186/

14. Valuers Registration Board members reappointed, Beehive.govt.nz – Ministerial release (Hon David Parker, 2 Dec 2006) – Announces reappointments to the VRB; explicitly notes one member is reappointed “on the nomination of the New Zealand Institute of Valuers” and another was also appointed on NZIV’s nomination, confirming NZIV’s role in selecting VRB members – https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/valuers-registration-board-members-reappointed

15. Dirty Politics 2.0? Lobbying in the Shadows, LinkedIn Pulse – Bryce Edwards (Oct 2023) – Analysis piece by political scientist Bryce Edwards discussing hidden influence in NZ politics; mentions the launch of the Integrity Institute’s NZ Lobbying & Influence Register aiming to detail political activities of industry groups, and notes how outfits like The Campaign Company operate as covert influencers. Provides context that NZ ranks low on regulating influence and has no lobbyist register, creating a “Wild West” where entities can flourish behind closed doors – https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dirty-politics-20-lobbying-shadows-bryce-edwards-rqvxc

16. Legislation highlights need for professional managers, NZ Herald (Colin Taylor, 4 Sep 2009) – Article quoting PINZ President Ian Campbell about upcoming legislation affecting property managers; notes PINZ’s 2600 members and that PINZ plays a leadership role in educating them; underscores PINZ’s push for using professional property managers ahead of law changes – https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/legislation-highlights-need-for-professional-managers/KMO6ULRIN7FI5ICUZJ46LUSJB4/

17. Jason Ede – PINZ LinkedIn Profile, LinkedIn.com – Shows Jason Ede’s position as Chief of Communications & Strategy at Property Institute of NZ since Sept 2016, highlighting his move from politics to PINZ (profile snippet via search) – https://nz.linkedin.com/in/jason-ede (Note: LinkedIn profile confirms role; background from NZ Herald Dirty Politics article used for context).

18. Why you shouldn’t bet against another property boom, OneRoof/ NZ Herald (Ashley Church column, 2021) – Tagline identifies Ashley Church as “former CEO of the Property Institute of NZ and the Auckland Property Investors Association” and notes he’s a long-time media commentator, illustrating his dual roles and media influence – https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/ashley-church-why-you-shouldnt-bet-against-another-property-boom-36140

19. Integrity Briefing: Launching the NZ Lobbying & Influence Register, Democracy Project (Bryce Edwards’ Substack) (April 2025) – Announces the Integrity Institute’s lobbying register initiative, describing it as an independent public ledger of entities exerting influence (like companies, industry groups, etc.) and explaining the rationale that NZ needs this because so much lobbying is unregulated and unseen – [Substack URL; content referenced in LinkedIn piece above].

20. Technical Note – Incorporated Societies Table, XRB.govt.nz – Data showing Property Institute of NZ Incorporated (society number 1001330) in a list of societies, confirming its registered status as an incorporated society (as referenced via CompanyHub info on Property Education & Training Ltd shareholding) – (Source: External Reporting Board PDF, showing PINZ Inc. reg. no. 1001330).

21. Property Institute of New Zealand – Submission to the Tax Working Group opposing Capital Gains Tax proposals (September 2018; argues CGT ineffective on affordability, risks rental market impacts) –https://taxworkinggroup.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2018-09/twg-subm-3983343-property-institute-of-new-zealand.pdf

Spot anything in this entry that is wrong? Please either leave a comment at the end or email, in confidence: bryce@democracyproject.nz